Construction Industry Optimistic: Activity Expected to Improve in 2012

Highlights of the 2012 Construction Industry Forecast:

• The worst is behind us... The OQ of 114 is a strong indicator that the industry expects 2012 non-residential construction activity to improve from last year. The 2012 OQ exceeds the score of 109 recorded in 2005, near the height of the construction boom. After falling to an all-time low score of 42 in 2009, the OQ climbed to 66 in 2010 and 96 in 2011.
• …but overall numbers of contractors remains a concern. In spite of rising optimism over the last three years and strong optimism for 2012, industry executives remain cautious about the amount of available work to sustain the current number of non-residential construction contractors. About four in ten respondents (41.7%) said they expect fewer contractors in their markets by the end of the year. Only 10.4% expect the number of contractors in their area to increase in 2012.
• Equipment distributors are very optimistic. When asked about their forecast for new equipment sales, 73.3% said they expect to sell more in 2012 than in 2011, and zero respondents said they expect a decrease in new equipment sales. Optimism among construction equipment distributors was high with nearly six in ten distributors (58.1%) expecting an increase in local non-residential construction activity. Only 1.5% said they expect that activity to decrease in 2012.
• Contractors are optimistic, but not as much. While 18.3% of contractors said they expect to acquire more new equipment in 2012 than they acquired in 2011, 52.% said they would acquire the same amount and 29.2% said they expect to buy less new equipment in the coming year. 40.3% of contractors said they expect non-residential construction activity to increase in the coming year; 47.3% expect the same level; and 12.4% said they expect non-residential activity levels to decrease.

New Leasing Proposals Continue to Draw Heat

FASB and the IASB respond to criticism as they prepare a new exposure draft for lease accounting.

The lease accounting debate rages on as the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) pore over nearly 800 public comment letters that question proposed new leasing standards. Board officials hit the conference circuit last month to answer detractors, clarify the exposure drafts they released to the public in August 2010, and talk about adjustments they are making to the original proposals.

Among the topics continuing to grab plenty of attention is the “right-of-use” asset concept, which, if approved, would require companies to capitalize operating leases they could traditionally keep off their balance sheets, such as those for real estate and equipment. The boards are also modifying their treatment of lease-renewal options, short-term leases, and variable lease payments.

Under the original exposure draft, companies would have been required to include in their lease term (and record on the balance sheet) any renewal period they were likely to exercise. Under the new proposal, lessees would account for a renewal period only if they had “significant economic incentive to exercise” that option.
In a client advisory earlier this year, Ernst & Young said such an economic incentive might include renewal rates priced at a bargain, penalty payments for relocating, or significant installment costs expended. One possible scenario suggested by Bill Bosco, a member of the IASB working group (external subject-matter experts who provide input to the board): a company that invests millions of dollars to renovate a store may be required to account for the renewal period because it would be compelled to recover its costs by extending the lease. This adjustment to the lease term, Bosco says, pushes the standard closer to current generally accepted accounting principles.
The proposed adjustments also remove some of the complexity for companies that hold leases for less than one year; under the draft rules, those short-term leases would still be considered a rent expense and would not be placed on the balance sheet. The new exposure draft also allows companies to keep certain variable lease payments off their balance sheets.
While those moves may placate some of the criticism leveled at the new proposals, one of the most controversial, and central, aspects of the lease-accounting changes has not been modified: abandoning the use of a straight-line average rent expense over a contract’s term in favor of a system requiring companies to front-load their rent expense on the income statement by splitting it into an amortization expense and an interest expense.
This aspect of the standard, Bosco says, does not reflect the reality of most leases. “We’d rather that companies’ lease costs. . .be represented in their financial statements in a way that represents the economic effect of a lease transaction, which we think is a level, monthly lease cost,” he says.
Ultimately, the proposed standard leaves more to interpretation than current rules, says Mindy Berman, managing director at Jones Lang Lasalle, a real-estate services firm. “There are a lot of subjective evaluations and a lot of nuances that will definitely affect companies’ implementation,” she says. Berman believes finance will have to partner more closely with business units to sort through them all.
The IASB and FASB plan to release the revised exposure draft for further public comment at the beginning of 2012, and hope to have a final rule in place by the end of the year.

Companies to lose equipment-finance tax breaks in 2012

Two generous tax breaks small-business owners received during the recession are going to shrink dramatically in 2012. That makes year-end tax planning more important than usual.

The changes affect the deductions for purchases of equipment. One is called the Section 179 deduction, named for a provision of the Internal Revenue Code. The other is called bonus depreciation. Congress approved the breaks to make it easier for small businesses to expand and hire workers. Although the economy is still slow, the breaks are being scaled back.

Ed Smith, a tax partner at the accounting and consulting firm BDO in Boston, says he's talking with clients about whether it makes sense to buy equipment before the changes take effect.

"Understand that we're not going to have this deduction in the next couple of years," he said.

The Section 179 deduction allows a small business to deduct upfront rather than depreciate the cost of equipment, such as computers, vehicles, machines in manufacturing, office furniture and sheds.

The deduction for 2011 is $500,000. In 2012, it will drop to $125,000. And in 2013, it's expected to fall to $25,000 — the amount it was back in 2002.

Bonus depreciation allows small businesses to take a deduction for equipment expenses beyond the amount allowed under Section 179. For 2011, the bonus depreciation is 100 percent. The maximum that can be deducted under the two deductions combined is $2 million. In 2012, bonus depreciation drops to 50 percent.

Under normal depreciation rules, the cost of equipment is deducted over a number of years according to a formula set by the IRS. So the Section 179 and bonus depreciation provisions have given small businesses accelerated tax savings.

You can learn more about the deductions in IRS Publication 946, "How to Depreciate Property." It goes into detail about the deductions and the regulations that govern how they can be taken. For example, the Section 179 deduction can't be used for your new heating and air conditioning unit. But that equipment can be depreciated.

It's also a good idea to discuss your plans with an accountant or tax attorney.

Changes in the tax law shouldn't be the biggest reason for buying equipment. Deductions aren't worth it if you're wasting your money on something your business doesn't need. But if you've been debating whether to buy tablet computers for your employees or install manufacturing equipment in 2011 or in 2012, it might make sense to move the purchase into this year. If you can get a better price than you would next year, that's another reason to buy now.

A big caveat: The equipment has to be up and running by Dec. 31. You can't order a new server or drill press this year, have it delivered in January and still take the deduction. You have to be able to use it — which means it needs to be installed — by the end of the year. However, it's OK if you don't pay for the equipment until next year, or if you're going to take several years to pay it off.

Something else to think about is whether you want to take advantage of these deductions now. You're not required to use Section 179 and bonus depreciation. In fact, you need to elect to take a Section 179 deduction when you file IRS Form 4562, "Depreciation and Amortization."

Depending on what your profits look like this year, and what they're likely to be in the coming years, you might prefer to use regular depreciation. So you might want to postpone your purchase until next year.

Smith says the money owners will save on their taxes from Section 179 and bonus depreciation can help them pay for the equipment they've bought. But using these deductions will eliminate any tax savings you would have had from depreciating equipment over time. Smith points out that when equipment is depreciated under regular rules, the tax savings from that can be used to cover principal payments if the equipment was financed. And the interest on financing is deductible.

Again, it's a good idea to consult a tax professional to decide which approach makes the most sense for your business. Source http://www.modbee.com/2011/10/26/v-print/1919770/tax-breaks-on-business-equipment.html

Equipment Leasing Slowly Rising

U.S. business borrowing for equipment up in Sept.

Oct 24 (Reuters) - U.S. companies borrowed more to buy or lease capital equipment in September and did a better job of keeping up to date on their existing debts, boosting a key measure of business activity, a lender group said on Monday.

The Equipment Leasing and Finance Association said U.S. businesses originated $7.1 billion in new loans, leases and lines of credit last month, up from $5.7 billion in August.

Companies use that money to invest in everything from tool-and-die machines and delivery trucks to office furniture and computer software.

"It's a replacement environment," ELFA President William Sutton said in a phone interview. "People aren't in a growth or expansion mode."

Demand for finance was up in the agriculture, healthcare and information technology sectors, Sutton said. The construction and trucking sectors remained weak.

The group, which represents the lenders who finance half the capital investment in the United States each year, said 2.3 percent of borrowers were 30 days or more behind in paying their debts, down from 2.5 percent in August and the lowest reading since late 2006, before the recession.

ELFA's confidence index rose to 50.7 in October, up from 47.6 in September. The diffusion index centers around 50, with any reading above that point positive and one below negative.

Source: Reuters

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/24/usa-economy-elfa-idUSN1E79N0JS20111024

Medical equipment leasing holds steady

It may come as a surprise in the current economy, but prospects for medical equipment leasing are looking good – and not just compared to other vertical markets.

And those figures aren’t small. The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis estimates that businesses invested about $81.6 billion in health care equipment in the year 2010. With approximately 62 percent of all U.S. health care equipment being financed, that brings the health care equipment finance marketplace to an estimated $506 billion in 2010, according to the Bureau, as reported by the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association (ELFA).

According to a 2011 survey by the Independent Equipment Company together with ELFA, medical equipment has been rated – for the sixth year in a row – as the type of equipment finance companies anticipate to have the greatest total dollar amount of new business volume.

Recent statistics bear this out; ELFA has found that member companies financed for medical imaging and electronic devices increased from 4.4 percent in 2009 to 4.5 percent in 2010.

This is not a decades-long trend, according to Global Industry Analysts (GIA). The research firm notes that medical equipment lease financing in the United States had been relatively low until five or six years ago, due to lack of awareness about leasing, reduction in reimbursements, and heavy regulations influencing physician referrals. But recently, note the researchers, health care institutions have come to see leasing medical equipment as an affordable and quick solution that saves working capital, provides options for purchasing the equipment, and facilitates upgrades to new technology.

IT is the “it” product

While medical equipment leasing has been stable, the software arena has experienced tremendous growth, particularly with the added interest in electronic medical records (EMR). “Every year over the past three years, medical leasing in IT has almost doubled,” explains French. “The tax incentive is definitely driving the market. It’s a phenomenon.”

The trend is expected to continue. GIA anticipates that medical IT equipment leasing and rentals will reach $56 billion by 2017. Interestingly, GIA notes that Europe is the single largest regional market for medical equipment rental and leasing worldwide, with the practice being particularly popular in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. The United States is next in line in market share.

Read entire article: http://www.dotmed.com/news/story/16907

Mazuma Capital: Chairman Ben S. Bernanke

Mazuma Capital: Chairman Ben S. Bernanke: Economic Outlook and Recent Monetary Policy Actions Before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C. October 4, 2011 ...

Chairman Ben S. Bernanke

Economic Outlook and Recent Monetary Policy Actions

Before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C.

October 4, 2011

http://www.mazumacapital.com/?p=1344